2014년 6월 4일 수요일

Culture... A Neglected Aspect of War


Culture... A Neglected Aspect of War

   

American culture is based upon the values 
of democracy, peace, and the rights of the individual. Violence, war, oppression of the weak, and human suffering are regarded as universal evils. 
The strength of these values are prevalent throughout America and institutionalize a common bond among Americans. Since these values are so dominant throughout society, Americans readily and incorrectly assume their values are universal, and that other countries should embrace and share these same views. However, history proves this untrue.

The desire of American culture is to avoid armed 
conflict or to seek quick resolutions to a conflict 
once it has been initiated. Unless an act of war has threatened the sovereignty of the United States, Americans will normally go to war only after all other political measures of arbitration have failed. 
Once the decision has been made to enter a war, 
society expects victory quickly. Americans are 
impatient and resistant to protracted operations. 
The intolerance to accept casualties, ingrained in 
the value of the individual, also contributes to 
a lessened resolve of commitment in other than vital interests.

Cultural similarities and geographical factors helped shape the boundaries of the emerging states. 
With few exceptions, the wars "of the kings" were 
over, and the wars "of the nations" had begun. 
Cultural-differences became subordinate to 
the political and economical needs of the nation,
and the traditional cultural struggles were eclipsed 
by wars of territorial expansion (a physical cause). Nations fought to become the predominant political 
and economical influence in Europe and throughout 
the world. Balance-of-power politics characterized Europe from the period of the mid-seventeenth century through the beginning of the twentieth century.

Why will cultural conflict dominate the future nature 
of war? Demographic and environmental stressors, combined with the resurgence of irredentism, will
cause people to seek similar cultural-preferences.  
These boundaries will act as the "fault-lines" of future conflict. Consequently, this results in conflicts among some adjacent civilizations that attempt to expand 
their influence and control over each other.

The emergence of the nation-state and colonialism 
led to the establishment of geographical boundaries 
that are based on western prototypes rather than 
cultural similarity. The concept of the state as 
a sovereign  community--unified politically, morally, 
and territorally--is being subjected to the processes 
of erosion in all parts of the world. Its substance is being worn away by fragmentation and separatism 
along narrow ethnic or linguistic lines; by civil disobedience and a faltering faith in law; and by war, covert foreign interventions or military aggression 
from without.

Cultural conflicts, often embodied with their unbridled savagery, are an ominous portent of the twenty-first century. The cataclysmic response of cultural war, combined with natural and man-made disasters, will require that the United States become even more actively engaged in world events in order to effect stability. 
The daunting temptation to view the problem, 
its causes and solutions exclusively from the American perspective will likely continue. However, in the 
multi-cultural environment of the modern world, 
foreign policy-makers and military strategists must recognize and analyze the multiple and distinct differences of cultures, as well as the different political and economical systems of both their enemies and allies. The approaches to the issue of culture and conflict may be diverse, but without embracing culture as a contributor to conflict, we will fall to develop 
the correct political and military means for 
their solutions.

The nature of war today underlines the importance of quality of leadership as technology and unconventional conflict will place greater responsibility on small unit leaders. A Chinese philosopher stated over 2,500 years ago:If you know the enemy and know yourself, you 
need not fear the result of a hundred battles. lf you 
know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. lf you know 
neither the enemy or yourself, you will succumb 
in every battle.

                                                         Major B. C. Lindberg, USMC
                                                         CSC 1996





댓글 없음:

댓글 쓰기